In this issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wang et al1 report results from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on exercise in pregnancy. They found that cycling exercises initiated at <13 weeks gestation that are performed no <30 minutes 3 times per week until 37 weeks gestation significantly reduced the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and gestational weight gain at <25 weeks gestation and lowered birthweight in a study that included 300 overweight or obese women carrying singleton gestations. Although these investigators found no significant differences between the exercise and control groups in the incidence of other outcomes such as preterm birth (PTB), gestational hypertension (GHTN), cesarean delivery, and macrosomia, all these outcomes were less frequent in the exercise group.1
This RCT is in agreement with previous data.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 There are indeed >50 RCTs published on exercise in pregnancy. These have been summarized in several metaanalyses.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Often dietary counseling or other dietary interventions, which are beneficial by themselves, have been studied together with exercise,8, 9 so it is important, as done by Wang et al,1 to focus on just exercise data when reviewing the previous literature. Two recent metaanalyses focused on just the effects of exercise on pregnancy outcomes.2, 3
A metaanalysis of 9 RCTs that included 2059 women with an uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy with normal body mass index showed that women who were assigned randomly to aerobic exercise had similar incidence of PTB, 49% lower incidences of GDM, 79% lower incidence of GHTN disorders, 18% lower incidence of cesarean delivery, and a 9% higher rate of vaginal delivery.2 A recent metaanalysis that focused, as in Wang et al,1 on overweight or obese women included 9 RCTs and 1502 women and showed benefits of exercise in terms of a 38% lower rate of PTB and 39% lower rate of GDM (Table 1).3
|Lower incidence of:||Higher incidence of:|
|Excessive gestational weight gain1, 8||Vaginal delivery2|
|Gestational diabetes mellitus1, 2, 3|
|Gestational hypertensive disorders2a|
View Table in HTML
Berghella. Exercise in pregnancy! Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017.
Our main aim in this editorial is to summarize this now extensive body of level-1 data, based on RCTs and metaanalyses of RCTs, so to provide easy-to-use advice for pregnant women and for us, their providers.
First, what are the benefits and harm of exercise in pregnancy? Table 1 lists the many statistically significant benefits of exercise in pregnancy that were reported in RCTs and metaanalyses of RCTs.1, 2, 3, 8 The list is quite noteworthy. To our knowledge, there is no intervention that we as providers can recommend to pregnant women as impressive in its significant impact on so many maternal and perinatal outcomes. Although nonpregnant data would perhaps predict that exercise decreases the incidence of GDM, the fact that exercise significantly decreases GHTN disorders, PTB, and cesarean delivery is remarkable and destroys the myth that exercise might be harmful in pregnancy, especially in terms of PTB. Moreover, there are good reasons why exercise would be associated with these many benefits. Exercise may decrease the incidence of GDM by attenuating the increase in insulin resistance that is associated with pregnancy.1 It may decrease the risk of GHTN disorders by reducing oxidative stress and therefore improving endothelial function.10 Exercise may decrease the incidence of cesarean delivery (and importantly increase the incidence of vaginal delivery) by improving maternal physical fitness and lowering birthweight.1, 2, 3
We could not identify any harm reported in level-1 data on exercise in pregnancy.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 In fact, the contrary is true. There are lots of data that bed rest or decreased activity are harmful in pregnancy, with increased risks of venous thromboembolism, bone demineralization, and deconditioning.11 Despite no evidence of benefit and known harms, bed rest continues to have wide use in obstetrics; approximately 15% of women each year are placed in best rest during their pregnancies in the United States.12 Seventy percent of Maternal Fetal Medicine physicians recommend bed rest for preterm labor (PTL), and 85% of them recommend bed rest in case of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM),13 with no evidence of benefit. In fact, decreased activity is associated with increased risk of PTB in women at high risk for PTB, such as those with a short transvaginal ultrasound cervical length.14
Second, which women should exercise in pregnancy? The short answer is just about every pregnant woman should exercise in pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) lists absolute and relative contraindications to aerobic exercise in pregnancy.11 To our knowledge, and as even ACOG implies, these are based perhaps on common sense, but none have been substantiated by data. For example, of the ACOG absolute contraindications to exercise in pregnancy, although some (hemodynamically significant heart disease, restrictive heart disease, severe anemia) seem reasonable, the others (cervical insufficiency or cerclage, multiple gestation, vaginal bleeding, placenta previa, PTL, PPROM, preeclampsia, and GHTN) actually may be situations in which some exercise may prove beneficial. We are not aware of level 1, or even good level II, evidence of harm from exercise in these situations. No evidence of fetal harm from exercise has been reported, with a 10–15 beats per minute increase in fetal heart rate (HR) during moderate-to-intense exercise and minimal decrease in birthweight from regular exercise during pregnancy and no increase in intrauterine growth restriction or small for gestational age.